Councillor R Powell proposed
that item 1 and 5 of the NASACRE Self Evaluation Toolkit be
discussed.
During the discussion the
following points were noted:
Key Area: 1e - Information and
advice
How well informed is SACRE in
order to be able to advise the LA appropriately?
- The SACRE Adviser stated that with
academisation and SACRE’s not being able to go into schools
to make judgement this was difficult. SACRE were relying on Ofsted
reports, and the Ofsted website for information and public
exams.
- Gurdev Singh, representative of the
Sikh Faith suggested that there was too much information and not
enough insight behind the information shared.
- The SACRE Adviser stated that
Officers were not always invited into schools.
- Councillor R Powell stated that
regular information was provided but more insight was needed, and
this was difficult to improve with the current structure.
- The SACRE Adviser stated that it
would be useful to invite schools to a future SACRE Board
meeting.
Action: Stacey Potter
Key Area: 1f - Partnerships
with key stakeholders
What partnerships does the
SACRE have with key local and national stakeholders, and what
quality are these?
- Several Rutland SACRE Members had
attended the National Conference and had undertaken various
training.
- Councillor R Powell stated that it
would be useful to hear the views of pupils and suggested that
schools share comments from pupils at a future SACRE meeting.
Action: Stacey Potter
Key Area: 1g – Relations with the
Academies sector
How effectively is SACRE encouraging academies
etc to see themselves also as stakeholders in their local area,
specifically by devising ways in which an academies presence is
incorporated into SACRE itself?
- The SACRE Adviser stated that
academies were attending the Network meetings regularly and the
teacher representative on the Rutland SACRE was part of an academy
school.
- Megan Davies, representative of the
National Association of Head Teachers outlined that by the end of
the next academic there would only be one school within Rutland
that was a Local Authority school. There were several academy
trusts within Rutland, and it would not be wise to state that the
Rutland SACRE had a great relationship with academies. The teacher
representative was representing teachers and not all of the
academies in the area. The links needed to be strengthened.
- The SACRE Adviser stated that it
would be beneficial to have more teacher representatives on the
SACRE Board and to look at the teachers and pupils as a whole
rather than the type of school.
- In response to a question from
Bjoern Finke, representative of the Roman Catholic Faith asking is
there were any links to independent schools, the SACRE Adviser
confirmed that there were currently no links but that it would be
useful to reach out to them.
- Councillor R Powell suggested that
the Rutland SACRE needed to strengthen its relationships with
academies and the independent sector.
Action: All Members
Key Area: 5a – SACRE’s
membership
How representative is SACRE’s membership
of the local community?
- The SACRE Adviser had tried to
contact Aga Cahn, representative of the Jewish Faith but this had
not proved successful. Stacey Potter to email Aga to advise that as
no response had been received, could another representative be
recommended to join the Rutland SACRE. Sheila Gewolb from the Board
of Deputies of British Jews would be included within the
email.
Action: Stacey Potter
- In response to a question from
Bjoern Finke, representative of the Roman Catholic Faith asking if
the Rutland SACRE had a representative from the Muslim Faith, The
SACRE Adviser would contact the Chair of the Peterborough SACRE to
see if they could recommend a representative.
Action: Amanda Fitton
- Members agreed that the Rutland
SACRE was Established within area 5a but this would be continuously
reviewed.
Key Area: 5b SACRE’s understanding of
the local area.
How much do SACRE members know and understand
the local community in its religious, cultural and ethnic
dimensions?
- The SACRE Adviser confirmed that the
census information would be published towards September 2022.
Key Area: 5c – SACRE’s engagement
with the community cohesion agenda. How much does SACRE understand
the contribution which RE/CW can make to a schools’ provision
for community cohesion?
- Councillor R Powell suggested
training to be provided regarding what the key area meant in
practice.
Key Area: 5d – SACRE’s role within
wider LA initiatives on community cohesion. How well is SACRE
linked to or consulted about LA initiatives promoting community
cohesion?
- Megan Davis, teacher representative
stated that community cohesion was not just about Religion and was
also in relation to bringing together all areas of the community
and this was being focussed on within schools.
- The SACRE Adviser confirmed that
Ministry of Defence schools had their own SACRE. The SACRE Adviser
would contact the Chair to invite them to attend a future Rutland
SACRE meeting to discuss how they met the needs of their children
within their SACRE.
Action: Amanda
Fitton